Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Pick a question we already ask

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

Or write your own question Your answer options (comma-separated, 2–6)

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Age band

Gender

Education

Household income

Marital status

Household size

K-12 children in household

Housing

Location type

Employment

Voting consistency

Voice tier

Forum engagement

State

County

Party identification (pick one or more)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Sample size (simulated completes)

Demographic options to show OPTION 1 — Basic Demographics OPTION 2 — Bundle A — Household & Family OPTION 3 — Bundle B — Economic Profile OPTION 4 — Bundle C — Civic Participation OPTION 5 — Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV

SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 49.8% — a solid but not commanding lead (10 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export

Disagree — 10.4% (104)

Undecided / Depends on details — 39.8% (398)

Agree — 49.8% (498)

AI-Powered Breakdown generated from this exact response set

Computed live from the 1,000 simulated completes — no model call, no delay.

What drives the leader

Party identification: Strong Republican (n=166) 100% (+50.2 pts)

Party identification: Strong Democrat (n=104) 0% (-49.8 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Democrat (n=66) 1.5% (-48.3 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Democratic (n=88) 8% (-41.8 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Republican (n=128) 90.6% (+40.8 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Republican (n=128) 75% (+25.2 pts)

Where the leader is weakest

Party identification: Strong Democrat (n=104) 0% (-49.8 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Democrat (n=66) 1.5% (-48.3 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Democratic (n=88) 8% (-41.8 pts)

Location type: In city limits (n=146) 32.9% (-16.9 pts)

Location type: Downtown (n=74) 33.8% (-16 pts)

Read-out

Lead with the Strong Republican block (party_lean): 100% back “Agree”, +50.2pt above the 49.8% average on n=166.
Do not open there: Strong Democrat (party_lean) runs -49.8pt under the average — 0% on n=104.
Geographic concentration: Kent County carries 2.5% of the sample at 72% on the lead answer.
Fielding cost of this cut: $0 · instant. A traditional panel would need 1,000 completes at ~$2–$6 each.
Answer spread (HHI) 0.417 — a real two-way contest.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band

45-54 — 44.2% (n=163)

18-24 — 35.6% (n=101)

35-44 — 40.1% (n=162)

55-64 — 64.4% (n=174)

75+ — 64.8% (n=91)

65-74 — 61.7% (n=133)

25-34 — 40.9% (n=176)

Gender

Female — 51.7% (n=518)

Male — 47.8% (n=452)

Prefer not to say — 56.3% (n=16)

Non-binary — 35.7% (n=14)

Party identification

True Independent / Moderate / Other — 35% (n=320)

Strong Republican — 100% (n=166)

Not-so-strong Republican — 90.6% (n=128)

Independent / Leaning Democratic — 8% (n=88)

Independent / Leaning Republican — 75% (n=128)

Not-so-strong Democrat — 1.5% (n=66)

Strong Democrat — 0% (n=104)

Registered voter status

1 — 50.2% (n=900)

0 — 46% (n=100)

State

NM — 40% (n=25)

NJ — 48.5% (n=33)

ID — 36.4% (n=11)

HI — 45.8% (n=24)

AZ — 53.2% (n=47)

NV — 56% (n=84)

ND — 45.8% (n=48)

MS — 71.4% (n=7)

UT — 48.3% (n=60)

FL — 60% (n=30)

VT — 45.1% (n=82)

AK — 40% (n=25)

OR — 46.9% (n=32)

PA — 41.9% (n=31)

ME — 48.4% (n=62)

NH — 37% (n=54)

MA — 60% (n=35)

LA — 55.6% (n=9)

SC — 48.7% (n=39)

AR — 55% (n=20)

NE — 33.3% (n=9)

RI — 65.7% (n=70)

DE — 38.1% (n=21)

WY — 65.6% (n=32)

CT — 55.6% (n=18)

MT — 37.5% (n=16)

WV — 28.6% (n=14)

DC — 53.8% (n=13)

KS — 80% (n=10)

AL — 37.5% (n=8)

MI — 14.3% (n=7)

Voting consistency

Every single election (Primary & General) — 49.4% (n=415)

Only in major Presidential elections — 48% (n=175)

Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 53.6% (n=289)

Rarely vote — 43.3% (n=90)

First-time participant (Future Voter) — 48.4% (n=31)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance

5 — 51.1% (n=742)

6 — 83.3% (n=84)

4 — 28.2% (n=174)

Public safety funding stance

5 — 75.1% (n=461)

4 — 28.4% (n=464)

6 — 100% (n=20)

3 — 0% (n=55)

School funding / choice stance

5 — 80.9% (n=397)

6 — 100% (n=41)

4 — 29.8% (n=453)

3 — 0.9% (n=109)

Regulation & business stance

5 — 87% (n=338)

6 — 100% (n=58)

4 — 33.1% (n=441)

3 — 0% (n=158)

2 — 0% (n=5)

Federal economy stance

4 — 41.3% (n=509)

5 — 91.8% (n=292)

3 — 1.7% (n=180)

6 — 100% (n=17)

Abortion stance

5 — 60.9% (n=379)

6 — 98% (n=198)

4 — 21.5% (n=311)

3 — 0% (n=102)

7 — 100% (n=6)

Property-tax cap debate

1 — 100% (n=406)

0 — 0% (n=398)

-1 — 0% (n=103)

2 — 100% (n=92)

Parental-notification debate

1 — 76.1% (n=327)

2 — 97.7% (n=87)

0 — 37.6% (n=399)

-1 — 8.9% (n=157)

-2 — 0% (n=30)

Biological sex in sports debate

1 — 89.4% (n=284)

2 — 100% (n=74)

0 — 39.3% (n=415)

-1 — 3.6% (n=197)

-2 — 0% (n=30)

Single-sex spaces debate

1 — 86.4% (n=317)

2 — 100% (n=77)

-1 — 2.2% (n=184)

0 — 35.3% (n=405)

-2 — 0% (n=17)

Policing vs. community safety debate

0 — 36.9% (n=444)

1 — 87% (n=332)

2 — 100% (n=30)

-1 — 8.2% (n=182)

-2 — 0% (n=12)

Senate/SCOTUS reform debate

0 — 40.6% (n=505)

1 — 88.4% (n=311)

-1 — 2.9% (n=170)

2 — 100% (n=13)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.