Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Pick a question we already ask

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

Or write your own question Your answer options (comma-separated, 2–6)

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Age band

Gender

Education

Household income

Marital status

Household size

K-12 children in household

Housing

Location type

Employment

Voting consistency

Voice tier

Forum engagement

State

County

Party identification (pick one or more)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Sample size (simulated completes)

Demographic options to show OPTION 1 — Basic Demographics OPTION 2 — Bundle A — Household & Family OPTION 3 — Bundle B — Economic Profile OPTION 4 — Bundle C — Civic Participation OPTION 5 — Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV

SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 53.5% — a clear, decisive leader (16.7 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export

Disagree — 9.7% (97)

Undecided / Depends on details — 36.8% (368)

Agree — 53.5% (535)

AI-Powered Breakdown generated from this exact response set

Computed live from the 1,000 simulated completes — no model call, no delay.

What drives the leader

Party identification: Strong Democrat (n=97) 0% (-53.5 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Democrat (n=84) 2.4% (-51.1 pts)

Party identification: Strong Republican (n=175) 99.4% (+45.9 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Democratic (n=74) 13.5% (-40 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Republican (n=135) 90.4% (+36.9 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Republican (n=121) 75.2% (+21.7 pts)

Where the leader is weakest

Party identification: Strong Democrat (n=97) 0% (-53.5 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Democrat (n=84) 2.4% (-51.1 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Democratic (n=74) 13.5% (-40 pts)

Location type: In city limits (n=148) 33.8% (-19.7 pts)

Location type: Downtown (n=64) 39.1% (-14.4 pts)

Read-out

Lead with the Strong Republican block (party_lean): 99.4% back “Agree”, +45.9pt above the 53.5% average on n=175.
Do not open there: Strong Democrat (party_lean) runs -53.5pt under the average — 0% on n=97.
Geographic concentration: Kent County carries 2.5% of the sample at 72% on the lead answer.
Fielding cost of this cut: $0 · instant. A traditional panel would need 1,000 completes at ~$2–$6 each.
Answer spread (HHI) 0.431 — a real two-way contest.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band

45-54 — 50% (n=146)

65-74 — 65.2% (n=132)

25-34 — 40.6% (n=155)

35-44 — 47.9% (n=163)

55-64 — 65.1% (n=169)

18-24 — 40.3% (n=124)

75+ — 67.6% (n=111)

Gender

Female — 54.7% (n=510)

Male — 52.2% (n=460)

Prefer not to say — 66.7% (n=15)

Non-binary — 40% (n=15)

Party identification

Independent / Leaning Democratic — 13.5% (n=74)

True Independent / Moderate / Other — 43.3% (n=314)

Strong Democrat — 0% (n=97)

Independent / Leaning Republican — 75.2% (n=121)

Strong Republican — 99.4% (n=175)

Not-so-strong Republican — 90.4% (n=135)

Not-so-strong Democrat — 2.4% (n=84)

Registered voter status

0 — 62.8% (n=113)

1 — 52.3% (n=887)

State

NJ — 55.2% (n=29)

AR — 51.9% (n=27)

AZ — 52.3% (n=44)

FL — 63.6% (n=33)

RI — 57.6% (n=59)

SC — 41.3% (n=46)

NV — 52.9% (n=68)

UT — 48.3% (n=60)

VT — 46.5% (n=71)

HI — 44.4% (n=27)

NH — 58.7% (n=46)

DE — 65% (n=20)

WY — 63.2% (n=38)

MA — 65% (n=40)

CT — 25% (n=16)

AK — 54.5% (n=33)

OR — 64% (n=25)

WV — 43.5% (n=23)

ME — 55.7% (n=61)

NM — 48.8% (n=41)

DC — 57.1% (n=14)

ND — 51.9% (n=52)

OK — 40% (n=5)

PA — 62.5% (n=24)

MT — 55.6% (n=9)

AL — 44.4% (n=9)

NE — 66.7% (n=12)

MS — 66.7% (n=9)

LA — 53.8% (n=13)

SD — 50% (n=6)

KS — 33.3% (n=9)

TN — 60% (n=5)

ID — 50% (n=10)

Voting consistency

Every single election (Primary & General) — 58.2% (n=416)

First-time participant (Future Voter) — 44.1% (n=34)

Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 45.5% (n=266)

Only in major Presidential elections — 56.8% (n=190)

Rarely vote — 52.1% (n=94)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance

5 — 56.4% (n=724)

4 — 20.9% (n=172)

6 — 87.5% (n=104)

Public safety funding stance

5 — 78.4% (n=468)

4 — 32.3% (n=471)

3 — 0% (n=45)

6 — 100% (n=16)

School funding / choice stance

4 — 34.1% (n=428)

5 — 82.3% (n=417)

6 — 97.8% (n=45)

3 — 1.8% (n=110)

Regulation & business stance

3 — 1.2% (n=172)

4 — 40% (n=400)

5 — 85.7% (n=364)

6 — 100% (n=61)

Federal economy stance

4 — 45.2% (n=462)

3 — 3.7% (n=187)

5 — 91.8% (n=341)

6 — 100% (n=6)

Abortion stance

4 — 23.5% (n=302)

5 — 66.1% (n=363)

6 — 96.9% (n=224)

3 — 1% (n=103)

7 — 100% (n=6)

Property-tax cap debate

0 — 0% (n=368)

1 — 100% (n=420)

-1 — 0% (n=96)

2 — 100% (n=115)

Parental-notification debate

0 — 41.9% (n=396)

-1 — 8.4% (n=166)

1 — 81.5% (n=330)

2 — 100% (n=86)

-2 — 0% (n=22)

Biological sex in sports debate

0 — 42.5% (n=388)

-2 — 0% (n=32)

1 — 87.6% (n=314)

2 — 98.8% (n=83)

-1 — 7.1% (n=183)

Single-sex spaces debate

-1 — 4% (n=174)

0 — 38.9% (n=391)

1 — 86.8% (n=340)

2 — 100% (n=81)

-2 — 0% (n=14)

Policing vs. community safety debate

-1 — 5.2% (n=173)

0 — 45.1% (n=435)

1 — 87.3% (n=338)

2 — 100% (n=35)

-2 — 0% (n=19)

Senate/SCOTUS reform debate

-1 — 2.9% (n=170)

1 — 90.1% (n=323)

0 — 45.6% (n=493)

2 — 100% (n=14)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.