Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 49.7% — a solid but not commanding lead (11.4 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Each row is a segment; each column is one answer. This is the matrix your campaign actually targets — every cell is a real count from the simulated sample.

SegmentDisagreeUndecided / Depends on detailsAgreen
ALL SIMULATED VOTERS 12%38.3%49.7% 1,000
Age band · 25-34 18.6%44.6%36.7% 177
55-64 4.8%27.4%67.9% 168
18-24 18.3%47.7%33.9% 109
35-44 13.5%44.7%41.8% 141
65-74 6.5%33.8%59.7% 139
45-54 14.4%39.2%46.4% 153
75+ 8%31.9%60.2% 113
Gender · Male 10.9%40.2%48.9% 450
Female 13.3%36.8%49.9% 527
Prefer not to say 7.1%28.6%64.3% 14
Non-binary 0%44.4%55.6% 9
Party identification · Strong Republican 0%0.6%99.4% 170
True Independent / Moderate / Other 2.2%62.8%35% 277
Strong Democrat 61.5%38.5%0% 122
Independent / Leaning Republican 0%26.1%73.9% 134
Not-so-strong Democrat 31.1%67.6%1.4% 74
Independent / Leaning Democratic 17.2%68.8%14% 93
Not-so-strong Republican 0%9.2%90.8% 130
Registered voter status · 1 11.8%38%50.2% 873
0 13.4%40.2%46.5% 127
State · HI 16.7%33.3%50% 18
DE 13.3%46.7%40% 15
AZ 12.8%41%46.2% 39
VT 12.7%36.4%50.9% 55
SC 13.8%36.2%50% 58
RI 12.1%32.8%55.2% 58
FL 32.3%25.8%41.9% 31
NV 5.8%43.5%50.7% 69
UT 4.5%39.4%56.1% 66
SD 22.2%33.3%44.4% 9
AR 8%40%52% 25
AL 9.1%18.2%72.7% 11
CT 11.8%35.3%52.9% 17
NM 10%42.5%47.5% 40
MA 3.7%44.4%51.9% 27
AK 25.9%29.6%44.4% 27
WY 7.1%42.9%50% 28
NH 17.9%46.4%35.7% 56
ME 11.7%38.3%50% 60
MS 25%12.5%62.5% 8
ND 7.4%38.9%53.7% 54
NJ 6.1%39.4%54.5% 33
MT 17.4%39.1%43.5% 23
OR 10.5%39.5%50% 38
PA 3.3%33.3%63.3% 30
KS 8.3%58.3%33.3% 12
WV 18.5%55.6%25.9% 27
DC 9.1%45.5%45.5% 11
LA 7.7%23.1%69.2% 13
MI 40%0%60% 5
NE 14.3%35.7%50% 14
ID 14.3%28.6%57.1% 7
Voting consistency · Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) 9.3%39.5%51.2% 291
Every single election (Primary & General) 11.7%35.3%53% 402
Only in major Presidential elections 14%39%47.1% 172
First-time participant (Future Voter) 17.9%35.9%46.2% 39
Rarely vote 15.6%46.9%37.5% 96
Infrastructure & roads stance · 6 0%13.7%86.3% 95
5 8.9%39.3%51.9% 700
4 28.3%46.3%25.4% 205
Public safety funding stance · 5 0.9%20.3%78.8% 444
4 18.3%54%27.7% 476
3 44.6%55.4%0% 65
6 0%0%100% 15
School funding / choice stance · 6 0%0%100% 39
5 0.2%20.4%79.4% 412
3 50.4%48.2%1.5% 137
4 12.1%56.6%31.3% 412
Regulation & business stance · 5 0%15.4%84.6% 363
4 6.3%59.4%34.3% 394
3 48.9%48.9%2.2% 186
6 0%0%100% 51
2 66.7%33.3%0% 6
Federal economy stance · 5 0%11.2%88.8% 322
4 5.4%53.1%41.5% 463
3 47%50%3% 200
6 0%0%100% 13
Abortion stance · 6 0%2%98% 200
4 14.5%66.8%18.7% 289
3 55%45%0% 131
5 0.8%34.4%64.8% 369
7 0%0%100% 8
Property-tax cap debate · 1 0%0%100% 396
0 0%100%0% 383
-1 100%0%0% 118
2 0%0%100% 101
Parental-notification debate · 2 0%2.4%97.6% 85
0 7.1%56.5%36.4% 368
-1 37.8%56.1%6.1% 196
-2 67.9%32.1%0% 28
1 0.3%16.7%83% 323
Biological sex in sports debate · 1 0%12.3%87.7% 309
-1 43.2%51.6%5.3% 190
0 3.4%60.7%35.9% 379
2 0%0%100% 80
-2 59.5%40.5%0% 42
Single-sex spaces debate · 2 0%0%100% 82
0 6%59.3%34.7% 369
-2 68.8%31.3%0% 16
1 0%14.7%85.3% 326
-1 42%53.6%4.3% 207
Policing vs. community safety debate · 1 0.3%15%84.7% 354
0 7.1%53.5%39.4% 411
-1 43%53.4%3.6% 193
2 0%0%100% 28
-2 50%50%0% 14
Senate/SCOTUS reform debate · 1 0%9.5%90.5% 304
0 7.3%53.5%39.2% 492
-1 46.1%49.4%4.4% 180
2 0%0%100% 21

Turn on more demographic options in the form above to add their cuts to this matrix.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band
25-34 — 36.7% (n=177)
55-64 — 67.9% (n=168)
18-24 — 33.9% (n=109)
35-44 — 41.8% (n=141)
65-74 — 59.7% (n=139)
45-54 — 46.4% (n=153)
75+ — 60.2% (n=113)
Gender
Male — 48.9% (n=450)
Female — 49.9% (n=527)
Prefer not to say — 64.3% (n=14)
Non-binary — 55.6% (n=9)
Party identification
Strong Republican — 99.4% (n=170)
True Independent / Moderate / Other — 35% (n=277)
Strong Democrat — 0% (n=122)
Independent / Leaning Republican — 73.9% (n=134)
Not-so-strong Democrat — 1.4% (n=74)
Independent / Leaning Democratic — 14% (n=93)
Not-so-strong Republican — 90.8% (n=130)
Registered voter status
1 — 50.2% (n=873)
0 — 46.5% (n=127)
State
HI — 50% (n=18)
DE — 40% (n=15)
AZ — 46.2% (n=39)
VT — 50.9% (n=55)
SC — 50% (n=58)
RI — 55.2% (n=58)
FL — 41.9% (n=31)
NV — 50.7% (n=69)
UT — 56.1% (n=66)
SD — 44.4% (n=9)
AR — 52% (n=25)
AL — 72.7% (n=11)
CT — 52.9% (n=17)
NM — 47.5% (n=40)
MA — 51.9% (n=27)
AK — 44.4% (n=27)
WY — 50% (n=28)
NH — 35.7% (n=56)
ME — 50% (n=60)
MS — 62.5% (n=8)
ND — 53.7% (n=54)
NJ — 54.5% (n=33)
MT — 43.5% (n=23)
OR — 50% (n=38)
PA — 63.3% (n=30)
KS — 33.3% (n=12)
WV — 25.9% (n=27)
DC — 45.5% (n=11)
LA — 69.2% (n=13)
MI — 60% (n=5)
NE — 50% (n=14)
ID — 57.1% (n=7)
Voting consistency
Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 51.2% (n=291)
Every single election (Primary & General) — 53% (n=402)
Only in major Presidential elections — 47.1% (n=172)
First-time participant (Future Voter) — 46.2% (n=39)
Rarely vote — 37.5% (n=96)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance
6 — 86.3% (n=95)
5 — 51.9% (n=700)
4 — 25.4% (n=205)
Public safety funding stance
5 — 78.8% (n=444)
4 — 27.7% (n=476)
3 — 0% (n=65)
6 — 100% (n=15)
School funding / choice stance
6 — 100% (n=39)
5 — 79.4% (n=412)
3 — 1.5% (n=137)
4 — 31.3% (n=412)
Regulation & business stance
5 — 84.6% (n=363)
4 — 34.3% (n=394)
3 — 2.2% (n=186)
6 — 100% (n=51)
2 — 0% (n=6)
Federal economy stance
5 — 88.8% (n=322)
4 — 41.5% (n=463)
3 — 3% (n=200)
6 — 100% (n=13)
Abortion stance
6 — 98% (n=200)
4 — 18.7% (n=289)
3 — 0% (n=131)
5 — 64.8% (n=369)
7 — 100% (n=8)
Property-tax cap debate
1 — 100% (n=396)
0 — 0% (n=383)
-1 — 0% (n=118)
2 — 100% (n=101)
Parental-notification debate
2 — 97.6% (n=85)
0 — 36.4% (n=368)
-1 — 6.1% (n=196)
-2 — 0% (n=28)
1 — 83% (n=323)
Biological sex in sports debate
1 — 87.7% (n=309)
-1 — 5.3% (n=190)
0 — 35.9% (n=379)
2 — 100% (n=80)
-2 — 0% (n=42)
Single-sex spaces debate
2 — 100% (n=82)
0 — 34.7% (n=369)
-2 — 0% (n=16)
1 — 85.3% (n=326)
-1 — 4.3% (n=207)
Policing vs. community safety debate
1 — 84.7% (n=354)
0 — 39.4% (n=411)
-1 — 3.6% (n=193)
2 — 100% (n=28)
-2 — 0% (n=14)
Senate/SCOTUS reform debate
1 — 90.5% (n=304)
0 — 39.2% (n=492)
-1 — 4.4% (n=180)
2 — 100% (n=21)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.