Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV
SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 49.4% — a solid but not commanding lead (11.1 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export

Geography — states

StatenFor leaderShare of sample
NV72 43.1% 7.2%
VT69 55.1% 6.9%
UT66 51.5% 6.6%
SC62 50% 6.2%
NH62 48.4% 6.2%
RI60 50% 6%

Geography — counties (top by sample size)

CountynFor leaderShare of sample
Kent County28 57.1%2.8%
Providence County25 52%2.5%
Franklin County21 52.4%2.1%
Essex County14 57.1%1.4%
Newport County13 69.2%1.3%
Chittenden County13 53.8%1.3%

Only counties that appear in this sample are listed. Widen the sample size for a fuller map.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band
65-74 — 61.9% (n=139)
18-24 — 34.7% (n=101)
35-44 — 42% (n=157)
25-34 — 38.5% (n=182)
55-64 — 63.4% (n=175)
45-54 — 38.9% (n=149)
75+ — 70.1% (n=97)
Gender
Male — 49.8% (n=488)
Female — 49.6% (n=480)
Non-binary — 31.3% (n=16)
Prefer not to say — 50% (n=16)
Party identification
True Independent / Moderate / Other — 39.1% (n=312)
Not-so-strong Democrat — 1.1% (n=89)
Strong Republican — 98.8% (n=161)
Not-so-strong Republican — 91.3% (n=115)
Strong Democrat — 0% (n=109)
Independent / Leaning Republican — 76.2% (n=126)
Independent / Leaning Democratic — 12.5% (n=88)
Registered voter status
1 — 48.8% (n=875)
0 — 53.6% (n=125)
State
ND — 51% (n=49)
AR — 60% (n=25)
MA — 40% (n=40)
MT — 55% (n=20)
OR — 37.9% (n=29)
NJ — 31.8% (n=22)
VT — 55.1% (n=69)
AZ — 57.8% (n=45)
NM — 41.7% (n=36)
NH — 48.4% (n=62)
NV — 43.1% (n=72)
RI — 45% (n=60)
PA — 53.8% (n=26)
AK — 38.9% (n=36)
HI — 61.9% (n=21)
WY — 51.6% (n=31)
DE — 54.5% (n=22)
ME — 48.2% (n=56)
FL — 56.7% (n=30)
UT — 51.5% (n=66)
LA — 36.4% (n=11)
ID — 60% (n=10)
WV — 50% (n=16)
KS — 50% (n=8)
MD — 71.4% (n=7)
SC — 50% (n=62)
CT — 70.6% (n=17)
NE — 20% (n=5)
MS — 100% (n=5)
AL — 80% (n=5)
MI — 33.3% (n=6)
OK — 20% (n=5)
DC — 53.8% (n=13)
Voting consistency
Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 46.6% (n=266)
Every single election (Primary & General) — 50.1% (n=415)
Only in major Presidential elections — 53.9% (n=193)
Rarely vote — 47.7% (n=88)
First-time participant (Future Voter) — 42.1% (n=38)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance
5 — 51.9% (n=729)
4 — 19.2% (n=182)
6 — 91% (n=89)
Public safety funding stance
4 — 29.4% (n=496)
6 — 100% (n=17)
5 — 76.9% (n=429)
3 — 1.7% (n=58)
School funding / choice stance
5 — 79.4% (n=360)
4 — 33.5% (n=471)
6 — 100% (n=50)
3 — 0% (n=119)
Regulation & business stance
4 — 36.3% (n=413)
3 — 4% (n=198)
5 — 85% (n=333)
6 — 100% (n=53)
Federal economy stance
4 — 40.8% (n=493)
3 — 4.2% (n=192)
5 — 91.9% (n=296)
6 — 100% (n=13)
2 — 0% (n=6)
Abortion stance
5 — 62% (n=395)
4 — 19.8% (n=283)
6 — 98.9% (n=181)
3 — 0% (n=124)
7 — 100% (n=14)
Property-tax cap debate
1 — 100% (n=380)
0 — 0% (n=383)
-1 — 0% (n=119)
2 — 100% (n=114)
Parental-notification debate
0 — 38.6% (n=394)
-1 — 7.6% (n=185)
2 — 100% (n=73)
1 — 79.4% (n=321)
-2 — 0% (n=27)
Biological sex in sports debate
1 — 87.4% (n=294)
-1 — 4.7% (n=213)
0 — 39.6% (n=384)
2 — 100% (n=75)
-2 — 0% (n=34)
Single-sex spaces debate
0 — 37.1% (n=396)
-1 — 4.1% (n=193)
2 — 100% (n=74)
1 — 82.6% (n=321)
-2 — 0% (n=16)
Policing vs. community safety debate
1 — 85.2% (n=310)
-1 — 6.7% (n=194)
0 — 41.6% (n=449)
-2 — 0% (n=17)
2 — 100% (n=30)
Senate/SCOTUS reform debate
0 — 41.6% (n=510)
1 — 88.6% (n=290)
-1 — 1.7% (n=176)
2 — 100% (n=22)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.