Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Pick a question we already ask

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

Or write your own question Your answer options (comma-separated, 2–6)

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Age band

Gender

Education

Household income

Marital status

Household size

K-12 children in household

Housing

Location type

Employment

Voting consistency

Voice tier

Forum engagement

State

County

Party identification (pick one or more)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Sample size (simulated completes)

Demographic options to show OPTION 1 — Basic Demographics OPTION 2 — Bundle A — Household & Family OPTION 3 — Bundle B — Economic Profile OPTION 4 — Bundle C — Civic Participation OPTION 5 — Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV

SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 48.8% — a solid but not commanding lead (7.8 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export

Every segment we hold, ranked. Sort it the way you think about the race:

Lead share — highest support for the winning answer first Sample size — biggest segments first Over-performers — furthest above the overall average first Under-performers — furthest below the overall average first Battlegrounds — most evenly split segments first (closest to a tie)

#	Segment	Demographic set	n	For the leader	vs. average
1	Strong Republican	Party identification	159	98.7%	+49.9 pts
2	Not-so-strong Republican	Party identification	115	90.4%	+41.6 pts
3	Independent / Leaning Republican	Party identification	122	72.1%	+23.3 pts
4	NJ	State	21	71.4%	+22.6 pts
5	AL	State	10	70%	+21.2 pts
6	55-64	Age band	147	64.6%	+15.8 pts
7	Farmette	Location type	96	64.6%	+15.8 pts
8	Unable to work / Disability	Employment	52	63.5%	+14.7 pts
9	65-74	Age band	154	62.3%	+13.5 pts
10	Debate regular	Forum engagement	103	62.1%	+13.3 pts
11	Retired	Employment	212	61.8%	+13 pts
12	Non-high school graduate	Education	83	61.4%	+12.6 pts
13	75+	Age band	92	60.9%	+12.1 pts
14	Own my home (with or without a mortgage)	Housing	611	60.1%	+11.3 pts
15	DE	State	24	58.3%	+9.5 pts
16	MS	State	12	58.3%	+9.5 pts
17	UT	State	72	58.3%	+9.5 pts
18	Yes, grandchildren only (not primary dependent children)	K-12 children in household	184	58.2%	+9.4 pts
19	PA	State	38	57.9%	+9.1 pts
20	Country — 5 to 50 acres	Location type	133	57.9%	+9.1 pts
21	Country — 1 to 5 acres	Location type	125	57.6%	+8.8 pts
22	OR	State	28	57.1%	+8.3 pts
23	MT	State	21	57.1%	+8.3 pts
24	KS	State	7	57.1%	+8.3 pts
25	Widowed	Marital status	70	57.1%	+8.3 pts
26	AZ	State	36	55.6%	+6.8 pts
27	Farm	Location type	102	54.9%	+6.1 pts
28	ND	State	33	54.5%	+5.7 pts
29	NM	State	37	54.1%	+5.3 pts
30	DC	State	13	53.8%	+5 pts
31	Country — no acres	Location type	122	52.5%	+3.7 pts
32	3	Household size	170	52.4%	+3.6 pts
33	HI	State	27	51.9%	+3.1 pts
34	Regular poster	Forum engagement	310	51.9%	+3.1 pts
35	$75,000-$99,999	Household income	137	51.8%	+3 pts
36	Every single election (Primary & General)	Voting consistency	408	51.7%	+2.9 pts
37	Female	Gender	475	51.6%	+2.8 pts
38	VT	State	64	51.6%	+2.8 pts
39	Only in major Presidential elections	Voting consistency	185	51.4%	+2.6 pts
40	Some college / Associate degree / Vocational training	Education	284	51.4%	+2.6 pts
41	0	Registered voter status	115	51.3%	+2.5 pts
42	$100,000-$149,999	Household income	123	51.2%	+2.4 pts
43	Yes, children in Homeschool programs	K-12 children in household	57	50.9%	+2.1 pts
44	Occasional poster	Forum engagement	383	50.9%	+2.1 pts
45	6+	Household size	77	50.6%	+1.8 pts
46	premium	Voice tier	274	50.4%	+1.6 pts
47	MA	State	32	50%	+1.2 pts
48	ME	State	67	49.3%	+0.5 pts
49	Rarely vote	Voting consistency	69	49.3%	+0.5 pts
50	Divorced / Separated	Marital status	126	49.2%	+0.4 pts
51	Married	Marital status	497	49.1%	+0.3 pts
52	$50,000-$74,999	Household income	224	49.1%	+0.3 pts
53	2	Household size	317	48.9%	+0.1 pts
54	4	Household size	133	48.9%	+0.1 pts
55	$25,000-$49,999	Household income	205	48.8%	+0 pts
56	1	Registered voter status	885	48.5%	-0.3 pts
57	No school-aged children or grandchildren in the household	K-12 children in household	475	48.4%	-0.4 pts
58	$150,000+	Household income	91	48.4%	-0.4 pts
59	free	Voice tier	726	48.2%	-0.6 pts
60	Postgraduate or professional degree (Master’s, Doctorate, Law, Medicine)	Education	121	47.9%	-0.9 pts

Segments under 5 completes are hidden. "Battlegrounds" sorts the segments closest to a 50/50 tie — that is where message testing earns its money.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band

75+ — 60.9% (n=92)

65-74 — 62.3% (n=154)

45-54 — 41.6% (n=161)

55-64 — 64.6% (n=147)

18-24 — 40.4% (n=114)

25-34 — 40.4% (n=166)

35-44 — 36.7% (n=166)

Gender

Female — 51.6% (n=475)

Male — 47% (n=496)

Prefer not to say — 40% (n=10)

Non-binary — 31.6% (n=19)

Party identification

Strong Republican — 98.7% (n=159)

Not-so-strong Democrat — 3.7% (n=81)

True Independent / Moderate / Other — 36.5% (n=337)

Strong Democrat — 0% (n=101)

Independent / Leaning Republican — 72.1% (n=122)

Not-so-strong Republican — 90.4% (n=115)

Independent / Leaning Democratic — 15.3% (n=85)

Registered voter status

0 — 51.3% (n=115)

1 — 48.5% (n=885)

State

NJ — 71.4% (n=21)

NH — 38.5% (n=65)

DE — 58.3% (n=24)

FL — 32.3% (n=31)

MS — 58.3% (n=12)

VT — 51.6% (n=64)

MA — 50% (n=32)

ME — 49.3% (n=67)

WY — 35.9% (n=39)

AZ — 55.6% (n=36)

UT — 58.3% (n=72)

AR — 41.4% (n=29)

NV — 38.3% (n=60)

OR — 57.1% (n=28)

AK — 45.5% (n=33)

RI — 47.3% (n=55)

NM — 54.1% (n=37)

DC — 53.8% (n=13)

HI — 51.9% (n=27)

AL — 70% (n=10)

PA — 57.9% (n=38)

LA — 23.1% (n=13)

MT — 57.1% (n=21)

SC — 46.8% (n=47)

ND — 54.5% (n=33)

MD — 40% (n=5)

KS — 57.1% (n=7)

CT — 47.1% (n=17)

ID — 37.5% (n=16)

TN — 0% (n=5)

WV — 47.4% (n=19)

Voting consistency

Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 43.2% (n=296)

Every single election (Primary & General) — 51.7% (n=408)

Only in major Presidential elections — 51.4% (n=185)

First-time participant (Future Voter) — 47.6% (n=42)

Rarely vote — 49.3% (n=69)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance

5 — 49.4% (n=697)

4 — 24.5% (n=196)

6 — 89.7% (n=107)

Public safety funding stance

5 — 74.4% (n=454)

4 — 29.5% (n=474)

3 — 0% (n=62)

6 — 100% (n=10)

School funding / choice stance

5 — 80.1% (n=386)

3 — 2.4% (n=123)

4 — 32% (n=463)

6 — 100% (n=28)

Regulation & business stance

5 — 83.7% (n=325)

3 — 1.1% (n=183)

4 — 38% (n=445)

6 — 100% (n=45)

Federal economy stance

5 — 88.8% (n=304)

3 — 4% (n=175)

4 — 38.8% (n=502)

6 — 100% (n=16)

Abortion stance

5 — 59.9% (n=387)

3 — 1% (n=104)

4 — 22.3% (n=318)

6 — 97.3% (n=182)

7 — 100% (n=7)

Property-tax cap debate

2 — 100% (n=94)

0 — 0% (n=410)

1 — 100% (n=394)

-1 — 0% (n=102)

Parental-notification debate

1 — 80.8% (n=323)

-1 — 6.1% (n=180)

-2 — 0% (n=21)

0 — 36.5% (n=406)

2 — 97.1% (n=70)

Biological sex in sports debate

1 — 85.4% (n=301)

0 — 36.9% (n=398)

-1 — 9.2% (n=207)

2 — 100% (n=65)

-2 — 0% (n=29)

Single-sex spaces debate

1 — 84.7% (n=321)

-1 — 5.3% (n=187)

0 — 35.6% (n=413)

-2 — 0% (n=20)

2 — 100% (n=59)

Policing vs. community safety debate

1 — 78.1% (n=347)

-1 — 8.5% (n=189)

0 — 40.5% (n=415)

2 — 100% (n=33)

-2 — 0% (n=16)

Senate/SCOTUS reform debate

1 — 89.5% (n=304)

-1 — 3.9% (n=181)

0 — 39.6% (n=503)

2 — 100% (n=10)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.