Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 51.1% — a solid but not commanding lead (13.2 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

AnswerCountShare
Disagree110 11%
Undecided / Depends on details379 37.9%
Agree511 51.1%
Total1,000100%

Download this result set as CSV

The CSV carries the headline plus every segment cut you have switched on — the file a pollster would hand to a candidate.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band
18-24 — 38.7% (n=111)
55-64 — 62.1% (n=177)
35-44 — 49.7% (n=143)
45-54 — 49.7% (n=169)
25-34 — 35.4% (n=164)
75+ — 64.6% (n=96)
65-74 — 59.3% (n=140)
Gender
Female — 51.6% (n=502)
Male — 50.3% (n=477)
Non-binary — 46.7% (n=15)
Prefer not to say — 83.3% (n=6)
Party identification
True Independent / Moderate / Other — 42.5% (n=318)
Strong Republican — 99.4% (n=163)
Independent / Leaning Democratic — 14.7% (n=95)
Independent / Leaning Republican — 82.6% (n=121)
Strong Democrat — 0% (n=114)
Not-so-strong Democrat — 4.9% (n=81)
Not-so-strong Republican — 88.9% (n=108)
Registered voter status
0 — 49% (n=96)
1 — 51.3% (n=904)
State
NH — 50% (n=58)
NV — 47.8% (n=67)
DE — 57.9% (n=19)
UT — 52.8% (n=53)
WY — 54.8% (n=42)
AZ — 46.3% (n=54)
ME — 55.6% (n=54)
SC — 57.7% (n=52)
MA — 34.9% (n=43)
ID — 86.7% (n=15)
FL — 48.5% (n=33)
NM — 50% (n=30)
VT — 52.1% (n=73)
HI — 52.9% (n=17)
NE — 52.9% (n=17)
ND — 42.6% (n=47)
DC — 60% (n=15)
OR — 39.1% (n=23)
NJ — 59.1% (n=22)
MS — 42.9% (n=7)
LA — 53.8% (n=13)
WV — 46.7% (n=15)
AK — 41.4% (n=29)
RI — 64.9% (n=57)
OK — 54.5% (n=11)
CT — 64.7% (n=17)
PA — 42.9% (n=21)
MT — 59.1% (n=22)
AR — 46.2% (n=26)
TN — 60% (n=5)
KS — 30% (n=10)
SD — 40% (n=5)
AL — 42.9% (n=7)
MI — 60% (n=5)
MD — 33.3% (n=6)
Voting consistency
Rarely vote — 39.3% (n=84)
Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 47.8% (n=299)
Only in major Presidential elections — 50.6% (n=172)
Every single election (Primary & General) — 56.7% (n=413)
First-time participant (Future Voter) — 43.8% (n=32)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance
4 — 28.7% (n=188)
6 — 92% (n=87)
5 — 52% (n=725)
Public safety funding stance
4 — 31.9% (n=483)
5 — 78.4% (n=435)
3 — 1.5% (n=67)
6 — 100% (n=15)
School funding / choice stance
4 — 36% (n=464)
5 — 82.1% (n=358)
3 — 3.8% (n=132)
6 — 97.8% (n=46)
Regulation & business stance
4 — 38.9% (n=411)
6 — 100% (n=63)
5 — 85.6% (n=333)
3 — 1.6% (n=189)
Federal economy stance
4 — 43.8% (n=495)
5 — 91.2% (n=294)
3 — 3.3% (n=184)
6 — 100% (n=20)
2 — 0% (n=7)
Abortion stance
4 — 21.5% (n=312)
6 — 97.8% (n=182)
5 — 67.6% (n=380)
3 — 0% (n=115)
7 — 100% (n=9)
Property-tax cap debate
-1 — 0% (n=108)
1 — 100% (n=418)
0 — 0% (n=379)
2 — 100% (n=93)
Parental-notification debate
0 — 41.2% (n=396)
1 — 81.6% (n=315)
-1 — 9.7% (n=186)
2 — 97.3% (n=75)
-2 — 0% (n=28)
Biological sex in sports debate
0 — 42.1% (n=401)
2 — 98.6% (n=71)
1 — 85.6% (n=299)
-1 — 8.3% (n=192)
-2 — 0% (n=37)
Single-sex spaces debate
0 — 38.4% (n=401)
1 — 86.1% (n=324)
-1 — 6.1% (n=179)
2 — 100% (n=67)
-2 — 0% (n=29)
Policing vs. community safety debate
-1 — 8.1% (n=185)
1 — 86.4% (n=308)
0 — 42.8% (n=460)
2 — 100% (n=33)
-2 — 0% (n=14)
Senate/SCOTUS reform debate
0 — 42.1% (n=497)
1 — 90.3% (n=309)
-1 — 4% (n=174)
2 — 100% (n=16)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.