Pollster Workspace PRIVATE · SIMULATED PANEL

Building a new poll for a client? Use the 3-step configurator to pick the district, the polling modules and the sample size — the cost updates live — Open the Poll Configurator

Write it, save it, run it, re-run it as opinion moves — then read it five different ways. Try a single poll first →

Every number here comes from the 10,000-voter SIMULATED panel. It is a rehearsal room for real polling, not a substitute for it.

1 · My polls

#PollQuestionStatusRunsLast runDemo optionsActions
2 Test poll A Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local…
Disagree · Undecided / Depends on details · Agree
 live 1 Sep 28, 17:14 OPTION 1, OPTION 5 Runs & results Edit
1 Test · property tax cap (WI)
created by the verification script
 Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local…
Disagree · Undecided / Depends on details · Agree
 draft 0 — OPTION 1, OPTION 2, OPTION 5 Runs & results Edit

3 · Results

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Run quick run Sep 28 · Sep 28, 2026 17:14 · audience: State = WI · simulated completes: 11 of 11 matching pseudo-voters · MoE ±41.8%

Agree leads with 63.6% — a clear, decisive leader, 27.2 pts over the next option.

Bar chart + AI narrativeCross-tab matrix (answer × segment)Segment leaderboard (sortable)Geography (state & county)Raw table + CSV export

Answer × segment. Every cell is a share of that segment's simulated completes.

SegmentDisagreeUndecided / Depends on detailsAgreen
ALL0%36.4%63.6%11
Gender · Male 0%33.3%66.7% 6
Female 0%40%60% 5
Registered voter status · 1 0%44.4%55.6% 9
State · WI 0%36.4%63.6% 11
Infrastructure & roads stance · 5 0%33.3%66.7% 9
Public safety funding stance · 5 0%16.7%83.3% 6
School funding / choice stance · 5 0%0%100% 5
Regulation & business stance · 5 0%20%80% 5
Federal economy stance · 4 0%16.7%83.3% 6
Abortion stance · 5 0%14.3%85.7% 7
Property-tax cap debate · 1 0%0%100% 6
Parental-notification debate · 1 0%20%80% 5
Biological sex in sports debate · 0 0%33.3%66.7% 6
Single-sex spaces debate · 0 0%25%75% 8
Policing vs. community safety debate · 1 0%16.7%83.3% 6
Senate/SCOTUS reform debate · 0 0%33.3%66.7% 6

4 · Demographic options on this run

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics included in this run

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band
Gender
Male — 66.7% (n=6)
Female — 60% (n=5)
Party identification
Registered voter status
1 — 55.6% (n=9)
State
WI — 63.6% (n=11)
Voting consistency

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family not included

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Turn this option on in the poll settings and re-run to collect these cuts.

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile not included

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Turn this option on in the poll settings and re-run to collect these cuts.

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation not included

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Turn this option on in the poll settings and re-run to collect these cuts.

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions included in this run

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance
5 — 66.7% (n=9)
Public safety funding stance
5 — 83.3% (n=6)
School funding / choice stance
5 — 100% (n=5)
Regulation & business stance
5 — 80% (n=5)
Federal economy stance
4 — 83.3% (n=6)
Abortion stance
5 — 85.7% (n=7)
Property-tax cap debate
1 — 100% (n=6)
Parental-notification debate
1 — 80% (n=5)
Biological sex in sports debate
0 — 66.7% (n=6)
Single-sex spaces debate
0 — 75% (n=8)
Policing vs. community safety debate
1 — 83.3% (n=6)
Senate/SCOTUS reform debate
0 — 66.7% (n=6)

5 · Run history & comparison

WhenLabelnHeadline answerLeader %vs. previous
Sep 28, 2026 17:14 quick run Sep 2811 Agree63.6% — Open

2 · Write a new poll

Audience — saved with the poll so every re-run uses the same electorate

Demographic options to include in every run

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.
Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.
Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.
Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.
What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

How to read and rank a result set

Five ways to view it

Bar chart + AI narrativeuse
Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment)use
Segment leaderboard (sortable)use
Geography (state & county)use
Raw table + CSV exportuse

Five ways to sort the segments

Lead share — highest support for the winning answer firstsort
Sample size — biggest segments firstsort
Over-performers — furthest above the overall average firstsort
Under-performers — furthest below the overall average firstsort
Battlegrounds — most evenly split segments first (closest to a tie)sort

The five demographic OPTIONS (Option 1 basic + the four bundles) are defined in one place — includes/lgn_poll_bundles.php — so you can re-cut a bundle at any time without touching this page.

Private workspace · token-gated · noindex. Panel: 10,000 simulated voters. Nothing here is real member data.