Pollster Workspace PRIVATE · SIMULATED PANEL

Building a new poll for a client? Use the 3-step configurator to pick the district, the polling modules and the sample size — the cost updates live — Open the Poll Configurator

Write it, save it, run it, re-run it as opinion moves — then read it five different ways. Try a single poll first →

Every number here comes from the 10,000-voter SIMULATED panel. It is a rehearsal room for real polling, not a substitute for it.

1 · My polls

#	Poll	Question	Status	Runs	Last run	Demo options	Actions
2	Test poll A	Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local… Disagree · Undecided / Depends on details · Agree	live	1	Sep 28, 17:14	OPTION 1, OPTION 5	Runs & results Edit
1	Test · property tax cap (WI) created by the verification script	Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local… Disagree · Undecided / Depends on details · Agree	draft	0	—	OPTION 1, OPTION 2, OPTION 5	Runs & results Edit

3 · Results

Which run

Re-run this poll

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Run quick run Sep 28 · Sep 28, 2026 17:14 · audience: State = WI · simulated completes: 11 of 11 matching pseudo-voters · MoE ±41.8%

Agree leads with 63.6% — a clear, decisive leader, 27.2 pts over the next option.

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment)Segment leaderboard (sortable)Geography (state & county)Raw table + CSV export

By state

State	n	Leader	Share
WI	11	63.6%	100%

By county (largest in sample)

County	n	Leader	Share
Racine County	11	63.6%	100%

4 · Demographic options on this run

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics included in this run

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band

Gender

Male — 66.7% (n=6)

Female — 60% (n=5)

Party identification

Registered voter status

1 — 55.6% (n=9)

State

WI — 63.6% (n=11)

Voting consistency

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family not included

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Turn this option on in the poll settings and re-run to collect these cuts.

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile not included

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Turn this option on in the poll settings and re-run to collect these cuts.

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation not included

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Turn this option on in the poll settings and re-run to collect these cuts.

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions included in this run

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance

5 — 66.7% (n=9)

Public safety funding stance

5 — 83.3% (n=6)

School funding / choice stance

5 — 100% (n=5)

Regulation & business stance

5 — 80% (n=5)

Federal economy stance

4 — 83.3% (n=6)

Abortion stance

5 — 85.7% (n=7)

Property-tax cap debate

1 — 100% (n=6)

Parental-notification debate

1 — 80% (n=5)

Biological sex in sports debate

0 — 66.7% (n=6)

Single-sex spaces debate

0 — 75% (n=8)

Policing vs. community safety debate

1 — 83.3% (n=6)

Senate/SCOTUS reform debate

0 — 66.7% (n=6)

5 · Run history & comparison

When	Label	n	Headline answer	Leader %	vs. previous
Sep 28, 2026 17:14	quick run Sep 28	11	Agree	63.6%	—	Open

2 · Write a new poll

Poll name

Internal note (optional)

Question from our own library (recommended — keeps the answers tied to stored stances)

…or write your own Answer options (comma-separated)

Audience — saved with the poll so every re-run uses the same electorate

Age band

Gender

Education

Household income

Marital status

Household size

K-12 children in household

Housing

Location type

Employment

Voting consistency

Voice tier

Forum engagement

State

Party (one or more)

Demographic options to include in every run

OPTION 1 — Basic Demographics

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

OPTION 2 — Bundle A — Household & Family

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

OPTION 3 — Bundle B — Economic Profile

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

OPTION 4 — Bundle C — Civic Participation

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

OPTION 5 — Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Default sample size

How to read and rank a result set

Five ways to view it

Bar chart + AI narrativeuse

Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment)use

Segment leaderboard (sortable)use

Geography (state & county)use

Raw table + CSV exportuse

Five ways to sort the segments

Lead share — highest support for the winning answer firstsort

Sample size — biggest segments firstsort

Over-performers — furthest above the overall average firstsort

Under-performers — furthest below the overall average firstsort

Battlegrounds — most evenly split segments first (closest to a tie)sort

The five demographic OPTIONS (Option 1 basic + the four bundles) are defined in one place — includes/lgn_poll_bundles.php — so you can re-cut a bundle at any time without touching this page.

Private workspace · token-gated · noindex. Panel: 10,000 simulated voters. Nothing here is real member data.